In the annals of misleading and ridiculous tweets, this takes the cake:— David French (@DavidAFrench) January 17, 2018
1. I did not argue in favor of risking nuclear war.
2. I never said anything like the words in those quotes.
3. I wrote only in favor of prepping for bad events.
Other than that, the tweet’s great. https://t.co/oWpXdnjOpD
Not only did I not write what she says I wrote, I’ve written at length about the profound risks in Korea.— David French (@DavidAFrench) January 17, 2018
Like here: https://t.co/VIxoTxRD1q
And here: https://t.co/4AIEK5PhkF
Then, to PUT IN QUOTES a pure falsehood is absurd. https://t.co/oWpXdnjOpD
This is not what @DavidAFrench's says - this is a totally unfair characterization of his column. And frankly I'm not surprised your framing has come from Newsweek which is an embarrassment.— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) January 17, 2018
Read David's column here: https://t.co/SJaf7Evda4 https://t.co/oA1vdfghF7
re:
And the magazine in question is the once-august National Review. We have truly entered the age of insanity when the conservative argument in favor of risking nuclear war is, "don't worry, it will only kill Democrats and minorities." Shame on you, @DavidAFrench https://t.co/YARwfhRNRE— Joy Reid (@JoyAnnReid) January 17, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment